I have heard that different experts from different health organizations have claimed that electronic cigarette is no good than regular cigarette. They are same as the regular cigarette in terms of the effects that is caused by it. Market experts had also predicted that these battery operated device can be the one that will replace regular cigarette in the market but health experts disagree. What I strongly feel is that all the allegations that are put on e cigarette by the health experts are pointless. All the surveys and reports that are published are based on an analysis of limited data and privately conducted tests.

I used to be a smoker but I am a vaper now and I know exactly how it feels with these electronic cigarettes. My Green Smoke electronic cigarette completely satisfies my craving and had also helped me in controlling my nicotine intake. I think these e cigs are seemingly much better alternative. The thing that makes me a bit worried is the constant storm that is hitting in the media regarding the electronic cigarettes. I mean that there are news that explains a test claiming electronic cigarette contains chemical same as regular cigarettes making e cigs looks more dangerous. But some things are needed to consider.

What I exactly feel is that all these tests are conducted in a controlled clinical environment which shows negative results of the test. According to me, test must be done in the actual world condition so that the result does not get affected by any other thing. The test result might also help the smokers to go for the best electronic cigarette brands of the market. Let’s put all the real life perspective into light, how many causality due to e cigarette usage have been reported till now or how many death has these device caused?