I'm thinking the development team was D2R Items chosen to run the company following Mike, and I think the promotion of Ray Gresko to be the chief development officer is an indication about not just the things that Blizzard values are, but also an evidence that Activision Blizzard understands what's important to Blizzard.
I absolutely love Diablo and am obsessed with it in ways I haven't been for any other Blizzard game, and I'm sure that's the case with other games. It's clear that creating new IP works for you, but you also have a stable of classic games that fans need more of, like StarCraft, like Diablo.
What's your view on creating new and innovative games, or relying on the past? Do you plan to play with the older game similar to what you've done with a classic that is wild or do you see a future in StarCraft and as well as the next game?
You know, I think we're lucky to have now four giant IPs in the form WarCraft, StarCraft, Diablo and Diablo. And then you have Heroes, which is sort of of an amalgamation of all of the sorts of borrowings from the components of the IPs.
It's an extremely effective feature. If I go back to an earlier question where I talked about these IPs and their ability for many of them in supporting different types of gaming experiences and experiences, it's something that we're always on the lookout for.
I personally think that there are characters and amazing stories, as well as plenty of games, and lots of games that we could create with our existing IPs. I believe there's plenty of space for this. However, that you do need to be thinking about new things as well.
And so both are important. Fans would like to see to see more StarCraft games. While I'm a fan, would also like to see more StarCraft games. Fans want additional Diablo games. I'm a big fan, and I also want more games from Diablo. Fans are always looking for new IPs I'm one of D2R Ladder Items Buy them.
|