There has been a lot of speculation about the battery operated device, electronic cigarettes that they are harmful to human that emits hazardous chemicals. What I think is there is still little definitive research that demonstrates the health and safety risks from vaping. So I do have one question, should high authorities treat vapor cigarette the same as secondhand smoke from tobacco products, even though there is no evidence. I just want to know is this justified.

So far, after going through the several results and reports available in the web, I have realized that there is no enough evidence as to its consequences, though I too is concerned about the health and safety of individuals. I am sure there are brands in the market that deliver best e cigarettes to all the people using theses battery operated devices. Well, I am a vapor too and buy electronic cigarettes from the topmost brands. But I have realized that major cities and states across the nation are following banning of smokeless cigarettes in public places. If the purpose of these bans is to protect individuals then I think the government agencies should be responsible and prohibit vaping indoors as well, like it has been prohibited on airplanes.

I just want the authorities to understand that restricting a personal liberty like puffing on an electronic cigarette at a public park is no way to reduce the harms to others. There are best e cigs like Blu cig that has been offering creditworthy products to its users. Well, I have been going through e cigarette reviews and brands like Blu have definitely stood up to the expectation of users by delivering the best electronic cigarette to all.

Yes, the health authorities are highly concerned for one’s health and they fear about the health impacts of e cigarettes on humans. But as per my perception, fear isn't a good basis for regulation. Research should be done and I am sure we will get fruitful results on it.